Skip to content

Conversation

@seawinde
Copy link
Contributor

@seawinde seawinde commented Dec 8, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

In the regression testing for synchronous materialized views, many cases specify set enable_stats=false. This can result in row counts being reported as unknown, causing the Cost-Based Optimizer (CBO) to inconsistently choose query plans that include materialized views. In real‑world environments, enable_statsdefaults to true. Therefore, to stabilize the pipeline and fix the flakiness of synchronous materialized view test cases, we are removing set enable_stats=false from the tests.

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@seawinde
Copy link
Contributor Author

seawinde commented Dec 8, 2025

run buildall

Copy link
Contributor

@hello-stephen hello-stephen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@hello-stephen hello-stephen merged commit e9f6253 into apache:master Dec 9, 2025
28 of 29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants