cephfs: add support for VolumeCondition in NodeGetVolumeStats operation #4125
Conversation
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
VolumeCondition/cephfs
branch
from
a3ee7e5 to
67de98c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
The new "data" subdirectory in the volume is bind-mounted inside the container. The root of the volume is not available for applications, so that Ceph-CSI can create a health-check file there and it is hidden from the users. Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@ibm.com>
nixpanic
force-pushed
the
VolumeCondition/cephfs
branch
from
67de98c to
7cee385
Compare
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
This pull request now has conflicts with the target branch. Could you please resolve conflicts and force push the corrected changes? 🙏 |
|
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
nixpanic
added
the
keepalive
|
This pull request now has conflicts with the target branch. Could you please resolve conflicts and force push the corrected changes? 🙏 |
1 similar comment
|
This pull request now has conflicts with the target branch. Could you please resolve conflicts and force push the corrected changes? 🙏 |
2 participants
This is my work-in-progress state for supporting
VOLUME_CONDITION, starting with CephFS.Updates: #1356
Show available bot commands
These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:
/retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the<job-name>after unrelatedfailure (please report the failure too!)